recherche

Accueil > Argentine > Économie > Dette externe > Economistes US demandent au Congrès d’atténuer les retombées de la (...)

1er août 2014

Economistes US demandent au Congrès d’atténuer les retombées de la décision sur la dette argentine

 

Toutes les versions de cet article : [Español] [français]

La décision « pourrait causer des pertes économiques inutiles au système financier international »

Plus de 100 économistes, y compris les Lauréats du prix Nobel Robert Solow, Branko Milanovic et Dani Rodrik ont demandé au Congrès US aujourd’hui de prendre des mesures pour atténuer les retombées nuisibles de la récente décision de juge Griesa du Tribunal d’instance US pour le District du Sud de New York qui exige que l’Argentine paie les créanciers holdout [fonds vautours] en même temps que la majorité de créanciers. La lettre avertit que « la décision du Tribunal d’instance – et surtout son injonction qui empêche actuellement l’Argentine de procéder au paiement de 93 % de ses détenteurs de titres- pourrait causer des pertes économiques inutiles au système financier international, de même qu’aux intérêts économiques US, à l’Argentine et à quinze ans de politique US bipartie d’allégement de la dette. »

« C’est une opinion largement partagée parmi les économistes que la tentative de la cour de forcer l’Argentine dans un défaut que personne – pas le débiteur ni les 90 % de créanciers – ne veut, est incorrecte et est nuisible », a dit Mark Weisbrot, économiste et Codirecteur du Centre pour l’Économique et la Recherche de politique (CEPR), qui a aidé à faire circuler la lettre.

La lettre avertit que la décision de Griesa pourrait « torpiller un accord existant avec ces porteurs d’obligations qui ont voulu négocier. » elle avertit aussi que, comme les gouvernements souverains n’ont pas l’option de se déclarer en faillite, « la décision de la Cour entraverait sévèrement la capacité des créanciers et des débiteurs à conclure une restructuration ordonnée si devait se produire une crise de dette souveraine. Cela pourrait avoir un impact négatif significatif sur le fonctionnement des marchés financiers internationaux, comme le Fonds monétaire international a mis en garde à plusieurs reprises. »

La décision de la Cour « crée un danger moral », écrivent les économistes, en permettant aux investisseurs « d’obtenir le remboursement, total, qu’importe à quel point était risqué l’investissement initial. »

CEPR. Washington, D.C., le 31 juillet 2014.

***

Lettre Complete avec les signataires :

July 31, 2014

Dear Member of Congress,

We note with concern the recent developments in the court case of Argentina vs. NML Capital, etc. The District Court’s decision – and especially its injunction that is currently blocking Argentina from making payments to 93 percent of its foreign bondholders — could cause unnecessary economic damage to the international financial system, as well as to U.S. economic interests, Argentina, and fifteen years of U.S. bi-partisan debt relief policy. We urge you to act now and seek legislative solutions to mitigate the harmful impact of the court’s ruling.

For various reasons, governments sometimes find themselves in situations where they cannot continue to service their sovereign debt. This was Argentina’s situation at the end of 2001. After years of negotiations, Argentina reached a restructuring agreement with 93 percent of the defaulted bondholders, and has made all agreed-upon payments to them.

The court’s decision that Argentina cannot continue to pay the holders of the restructured bonds unless it first pays the plaintiffs mean that any “holdout” creditor can torpedo an existing agreement with those bondholders who chose to negotiate. While individuals and corporations are granted the protection of bankruptcy law, no such mechanism exists for sovereign governments. As such, the court’s ruling would severely hamper the ability of creditors and debtors to conclude an orderly restructuring should a sovereign debt crisis occur. This could have a significant negative impact on the functioning of international financial markets, as the International Monetary Fund has repeatedly warned.

Those who invested in Argentine bonds were compensated with high interest rates, to mitigate the risk of default. There are inherent risks when investing in sovereign bonds, but the court’s ruling creates a moral hazard, by allowing investors to obtain full repayment, no matter how risky the initial investment.

The plaintiffs in the case purchased Argentine bonds on the secondary market after default, often for less than 20 cents on the dollar. While these actors could have accepted the restructuring and still made a very large profit, they instead have fought a decade-long legal battle, seeking exorbitant profits in excess of 1,000 percent and creating financial uncertainty along the way.

The recent developments will also directly impact the United States and its status as a financial center of the world economy. While much of the developing world’s debt is issued under the jurisdiction of New York law and utilizing New York-based financial institutions, the court’s ruling will make it more likely for sovereign governments to seek alternate locations to issue debt. Britain and Belgium, for example, have already passed legislation aimed at preventing this type of behavior from “holdout” creditors.

In addition, the court has put restrictions on New York banks, preventing them from distributing regularly scheduled interest payments to holders of the restructured bonds. Already, banks have faced lawsuits from investors, creating greater uncertainty for U.S.-based financial institutions.

Argentina has expressed a willingness to negotiate, and has recently reached agreements with the Paris Club as well as claims by international investors.

We hope that you will look for legislative solutions to prevent this court decision, or similar rulings, from causing unnecessary harm.

Sincerely,

 Robert Solow, Nobel laureate in Economics, 1987, MIT Professor of Economics, emeritus

 Dani Rodrik, Albert O. Hirschman Professor in the school of Social Sciences at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey

 Branko Milanovic, Luxembourg Income Study Center, the Graduate Center CUNY, former Lead Economist in the World Bank’s research department

 Andrew Allimadi, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs

 Gar Alperovitz, University of Maryland

 Eileen Applebaum, Center for Economic and Policy Research

 Mariano Arana, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento

 Leonardo Asta, Università degli Studi di Padova

 Venkatesh Athreya, Bharathidasan University

 Dean Baker, Center for Economic and Policy Research

 William Barclay, Chicago Political Economy Group

 Jairo Alonso Bautista, Universidad Santo Tomas

 Gunseli Berik, University of Utah

 Alexandra Bernasek, Colorado State University

 Cyrus Bina, University of Minnesota (Morris Campus)

 Josh Bivens, Economic Policy Institute

 Peter Bohmer, The Evergreen State College

 Korkut Boratav, Turkish Social Science Association

 Elissa Braunstein, Colorado State University

 Jorge BUZAGLO, University of Goteburg

 Jim Campen, Americans for Fairness in Lending

 Carlos A. Carrasco, University of the Basque Country

 Sergio Cesaratto, University of Siena

 Kyung-Sup Chang, Seoul National University

 Kimberly Christensen, SUNY/Purchase College

 Michael Cohen, New School for Social Research

 Brendan Cushing - Daniels, Gettysburg College

 Omar Dahi, Hampshire College

 Carlo D’Ippoliti, University of Rome

 Peter Dorman, Evergreen State College

 Amitava Dutt, University of Notre Dame

 Dirk Ehnts, University of Oldenburg

 Gerald Epstein, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

 Susan Ettner, University of California, Los Angeles

 Jeffrey Faux, Economic Policy Institute

 Massoud Fazeli, Hofstra University

 Andrew Fischer, International Institute of Social Studies

 Jeffrey Frankel, Harvard Kennedy School

 Roberto Frenkel, CEDES Argentina

 Kevin Gallagher, Boston University

 Chris Georges, Hamilton College

 Reza Ghorashi, Richard Stockton College

 Jayati Ghosh, JNU New Delhi and Ideas

 David Gold, New School University

 Neva Goodwin, Tufts University

 María Florencia Granato, Corporación Andina de Fomento

 Martin Hart-Landsberg, Lewis and Clark

 Conrad Herold, Hofstra University

 P. Sai-wing Ho, University of Denver

 Andreas Hoth

 Gustavo Indart, University of Toronto

 Joseph Joyce, Wellesley College

 J K Kapler, University of Massachusetts Boston

 Martin Khor, South Centre

 Gabriele Koehler

 Andrew Kohen, James Madison University

 Nikoi Kote-Nikoi

 Pramila Krishnan, University of Cambridge

 David Legge, La Trobe University

 Henry Levin, Columbia University

 Mah hui Lim, South Centre

 Rodrigo Lopez-Pablos

 Robert Lynch, Washington College

 Arthur MacEwan, University of Massachusetts Boston

 Jeff Madrick, The Century Foundation

 Cheryl Maranto, Marquette University

 Ann Markusen, University of Minnesota

 Julie Mattahei, Wellesley College

 Kathleen McAfee, San Fransisco State University

 Elaine McCrate, University of Vermont

 Hannah McKinney, Kalamazoo College

 Thomas Michl, Colgate University

 William Milberg, New School for Social Research

 Larry Mishel, Economic Policy Institute

 Mritiunjoy Mohanty, Indian Institute of Management

 Nicolás Moncaut

 Tracy Mott, University of Denver

 Michael Murray, Bates College

 Luiz M Niemeyer, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo

 Machiko Nissanke, SOAS University of London

 Manfred Nitsch, Free University of Berlin

 Jose Antonio Ocampo, Columbia University

 Carlos Oya, University of London

 Marco Palacios, El Colegio de México

 Antonella Palumbo, Roma Tre University

 Dimitri B. Papadimitriou, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College

 Mark Paul, University of Massachusetts Amherst

 Lorenzo Pellegrini, International Institute of Social Studies

 Lucia Pittaluga Fonseca, Universidad de la República (Uruguay)

 Renee Prendergast, Queen’s University- Belfast

 Mark Price, Keystone Research Center

 Alicia Puyana, Facultad Latinoamercana de Ciencias Sociales

 Charles Revier, Colorado State University

 Joseph Ricciardi, Babson College

 Malcolm Robinson, Thomas More College

 Leopoldo Rodriguez, Portland State University

 John Roemer, Yale University

 David Rosnick, Center for Economic and Policy Research

 Antonio Savoia, University of Manchester

 John Schmitt, Center for Economic and Policy Research

 Stepphanie Seguino, University of Vermont

 Anwar Shaikh, New School for Social Research

 Kannan Srinivasan

 James Stanfield

 Eduardo Strachman

 William K. Tabb, Queens College

 Ezequiel Tacsir, United Nations University

 Philipp Temme, Free University of Berlin

 Frank Thompson, University of Michigan

 Chris Tilly, University of California, Los Angeles

 Mario Tonveronachi, University of Siena

 Lawal Tosin

 Chiwuike Uba, African Heritage Institution

 Bunu Goso Umara

 Leanne Ussher, Queens College, CUNY

 Rolph van der Hoeven, International Institute of Social Studies

 Irene van Staveren, International Institute of Social Studies

 Matías Vernengo, Bucknell University

 David Weiman, Barnard College

 Mark Weisbrot, Center for Economic and Policy Research

 Thomas Weisskopf, University of Michigan

 John Willoughby, American University

 Yavuz Yasar, University of Denver

 A. Erinc Yeldan, Yasar University

 Erhan Yildirim, Cukurova University

 Ben Zipperer, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Retour en haut de la page

El Correo

|

Patte blanche

|

Plan du site